LeEco's upcoming Snapdragon 823 phone gets benchmarked

At the beginning of this year, Chinese upstart LeEco (then called LeTV) announced the first ever smartphone powered by Qualcomm's Snapdragon 820 chipset - the Le Max Pro. The SD820 then went on to feature in most flagships launched in 2016, but now it's almost time for a refresh.
And it looks like once again LeEco will be the first company to have a phone sporting Qualcomm's latest silicon inside. It's holding an event on June 29, during which it's expected to unveil the first handset powered by the upcoming Snapdragon 823 (also known as Snapdragon 821 sometimes), which is basically just an improved version of the 820.
Now it seems that LeEco's SD823 device has been put through the paces of the AnTuTu benchmark, something which has helpfully revealed many of its specs. As you can see from the image to the left, this is a LeEco phone with the Qualcomm MSM8996pro SoC - that's been rumored to be the model name of the SD823, by the way.
The device has a 1080p touchscreen, a 16 MP main camera, and an 8 MP selfie shooter. RAM is 4GB (but since the Le Max 2 has 6GB we assume there will be multiple hardware versions here, one with 6GB), and built-in storage sits at 32GB. The new LeEco smartphone runs Android 6.0.1 Marshmallow as you'd expect.
It managed to score a very impressive 154,272 in AnTuTu, which means it will (obviously) be more powerful than the SD820-powered Le Max 2.

New Verizon Galaxy Note 4 update brings June security patch

New Verizon Galaxy Note 4 update brings June security patch

Less than a month after receiving the Marshmallow update, the Verizon Galaxy Note 4 has started receiving a new update that brings along the latest Android security fixes (for the month of June).



The update - which bumps the software version to MMB29M.N910VVRU2CPF3 - doesn't seem to include any other change as the official change-log just says, "the current software update gives you the most up to date Android security patch on your device."

Given that the OTA update has just started rolling out, it may take sometime for the update notification to pop up on your device. Meanwhile, if you feel impatient, you can manually check for the update by heading to your handset's Settings menu.


Source

Why GM and Ford shares languish

Why GM and Ford shares languish

 
Question: Is Wall Street:

(a) A teacher handing out report cards?
(b) A Las Vegas sports book?
Executives at Ford Motor Co. and General Motors at times seem to think the answer is (a). They are chagrined that their genuinely impressive financial results have not won them more love on the Street.
Instead, share prices are sluggish. Ford has been trading in the low $13 range, roughly in the middle of its 52-week average. GM has been around $30, again mid-range over the past year.
So you had GM CEO Mary Barra complaining to Bloomberg TV this week that GM’s stock price is undervalued. Dan Amman, GM’s president, has said that eventually the market will recognize the company’s progress in building profits.
Likewise, Ford CEO Mark Fields earlier this year countered questions about share values by saying, “We’re going to focus on continuing to drive the business forward. At some point we’re going to get recognized.”
Well, maybe.
Looking from one perspective, Ford and GM deserve to see stock prices soar, based on their sky-high profits. GM posted $10.8 billion in pretax operating income for 2015. Coincidentally, Ford also raked in $10.8 billion pretax.
That used to be “Toyota money” that Detroit automakers could only dream about. (Toyota now makes a ton more that that, but that’s a different issue.)
But, to get back to my initial question, the Detroit duo would only get “recognized” if Wall Street functioned like a schoolteacher, handing out “A” grades for operational excellence.
For better or worse, Wall Street is more like a Vegas oddsmaker setting the spread for sports bettors. Wall Street is trying to forecast how much a stock will go up.
And for reasons ranging from the sales cycle (possibly peaking) to potential business model disruption (Google, Apple), the street is skeptical about the GM and Ford upside -- which, I suppose, eventually becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy.
How much more exciting to prospect for the next Tesla! Hard to recall, but Tesla traded below $25 in the first month after it went public on June 29, 2010 (and dipped below $15). Tesla closed down 2.6 percent today at $229.34, so you can calculate for yourselves the get-rich “if only” scenario.
That’s why I think GM and Ford might as well get used to their stock values. Despite vastly improved operations, GM and Ford look like buy-and-hold stocks, great if you want to collect dividends over the years.
But that’s just not sexy when you have Silicon Valley stocks blowing through the roof.

You can reach Dave Guilford at dguilford@crain.com